FILMGAZM PRODUCTIONS
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • ACTION
    • BIOPIC
    • COMEDY
    • CRIME
    • DRAMA
    • FAMILY
    • FANTASY
    • HORROR
    • MUSICAL
    • SCI-FI
    • SPORT
    • WAR
    • WESTERN
  • PODCASTS
    • THE FILMGAZM PODCAST
    • OSCAR SUNDAY
    • BEYOND THE BAD
    • FAKE TRUE STORIES
    • THE SNEAK PREVIEW
  • Articles
  • Hall of 10's
    • CONNOR'S HALL
    • CALEB'S HALL
    • AUSTIN'S HALL
    • JOSH'S HALL
  • Trailers
  • Meet the Team
  • In Memoriam
  • Ratings
Picture
A secretary steals $40,000 from her boss and goes on the run, only 
​to find herself 
at an isolated motel run by a maniac and his mother.
HORROR

Psycho (1998)

Directed by Gus Van Sant

Written by Joseph Stefano

Starring Vince Vaughn, Anne Heche, Julianne Moore,
Viggo Mortensen, William H. Macy, Robert Forster, Philip Baker Hall

Remake of 1960's Psycho

Based on the novel by Robert Bloch

Connor Eyzaguirre
August 26, 2019
5/10
1998's Psycho may just be the most pointless movie I've ever seen. It's an identical, shot for shot remake of the original classic, using the exact same script with zero deviations. The whole point of remaking a film is to bring something new to the table, to add in your own personal style to something already well-known. Rob Zombie did with Halloween, David Cronenberg did it with The Fly, John Carpenter did it with The Thing, even Zack Snyder did it with Dawn of the Dead. But Gus Van Sant decided to abandon all creative opportunities and produce the exact same film, minus all the chemistry, innovations, and scares that made Psycho the instant classic that film fans revere today.

We all know the story, only this time it takes place in the 90's, and nobody delivers a decent performance. Anne Heche is Marion Crane, who steals money from her boss and ends up at the Bates Motel, run by Norman Bates (played by Vince Vaughn. Seriously). She's killed and a private eye (William H. Macy) shows up to investigate, yada yada yada, we've all seen Psycho. But what this film does is show that everything that made the original film work came from Alfred Hitchcock. He made films for the future, not for his own time. The things he did with Psycho changed the game forever. And they can't be replicated. Just because you can paint a copy of the Mona Lisa, it doesn't mean you're Leonardo da Vinci.

Psycho '98 is an absolute waste of talent and time. Just stick to the original at all times. This one has zero redeeming qualities, from the horrendously phoned-in performances to the identical camera angles, it's a moronic concept that actually made it to film and, I think, set Gus Van Sant back quite a ways career-wise. The guy had just done Good Will Hunting, and he followed that with this schlock.

Mission Statement

Filmgazm is made by movie lovers for movie lovers. We believe in the magic of film and we aim celebrate films of all genres and throughout cinema history, regardless of who's behind the camera or who financed it. We at Filmgazm believe that every film deserves to be reviewed on its own merits and that's what we are here to do. Enjoy the show!
DISCLAIMER - Filmgazm does not own nor do we pretend to own any posters, artwork, or trailers on this site. We mean only to review
​and discuss movies. All trademarks are the property of the respective trademark owners.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • ACTION
    • BIOPIC
    • COMEDY
    • CRIME
    • DRAMA
    • FAMILY
    • FANTASY
    • HORROR
    • MUSICAL
    • SCI-FI
    • SPORT
    • WAR
    • WESTERN
  • PODCASTS
    • THE FILMGAZM PODCAST
    • OSCAR SUNDAY
    • BEYOND THE BAD
    • FAKE TRUE STORIES
    • THE SNEAK PREVIEW
  • Articles
  • Hall of 10's
    • CONNOR'S HALL
    • CALEB'S HALL
    • AUSTIN'S HALL
    • JOSH'S HALL
  • Trailers
  • Meet the Team
  • In Memoriam
  • Ratings